{"id":"W2886430050","doi":"10.1002/tesj.393","title":"Peer collaborative writing in the <scp>EAP</scp> classroom: Insights from a Canadian postsecondary context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TESOL Journal","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Collaborative writing; Peer feedback; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Second language writing; English for academic purposes; Academic writing; Perception; Meaning (existential); Collaborative learning; Mathematics education; Language proficiency; Pedagogy; Peer group; Second language; Social psychology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006321413,0.000167794,0.0001956391,0.0002427503,0.001332152,0.001059515,0.0003313584,0.00007078051,0.003918779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005789879,0.0001149052,0.00006489329,0.00008724936,0.000206948,0.0003415658,0.00002068387,0.001122382,0.0002891264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001090707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003416837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08687129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7133461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984295,0.0003641331,0.0003265624,0.0001721952,0.0003041173,0.0004034779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998513,0.0006004386,0.0001639856,0.0001574734,0.0003977524,0.0001673513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005797575,0.00003787978,0.003105746,0.00000319405,0.00008414089,0.0004193076,0.8869379,0.000001577509,0.00009185516,0.01510602,0.07646672,0.01773985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004982009,0.0001268088,0.004167211,0.00007286658,0.0000163294,0.00007397633,0.4136353,0.00008472792,0.00001906186,0.00115513,0.5800833,0.00006714798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7687314,0.001870949,0.000004546114,0.001173811,0.0004916503,0.00008653748,0.00005079921,0.0000217107,0.2275686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983272,0.000004874601,0.00005357588,0.007155235,0.003582971,0.000004689457,0.00002083281,0.00002175305,0.005884121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6264749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01720537616684151,"score_gpt":0.2341571878317423,"score_spread":0.2169518116649008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}