{"id":"W2886443927","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgy016","title":"A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Lausanne; York University; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Identification (biology); Forensic identification; Computer science; Inference; Perspective (graphical); Data science; Management science; Forensic science; Point (geometry); Field (mathematics); Empirical research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001012117,0.00007819537,0.000101817,0.00001546455,0.0003342978,0.00003366612,0.000115968,0.00007620207,0.000001499474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002603426,0.00004989896,0.00003433819,0.00008780523,0.0006936602,0.000006363407,0.0002010229,0.00006644861,0.000001610669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003027556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000223917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002510191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006064065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991042,0.0001044226,0.0002067545,0.0002846156,0.0001258908,0.0001741021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993287,0.00004806474,0.00005953024,0.0003645655,0.0001344014,0.00006470896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00124936,0.0005248004,0.09927664,0.0004040621,0.0003216731,4.512822e-7,0.008669463,0.0001746802,0.2072013,0.387141,0.00135792,0.2936786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002185052,0.002497906,0.3033437,0.0001301312,0.0002068758,0.00007228963,0.005083872,0.004649716,0.5480402,0.1014954,0.03141729,0.0008776294],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798899,0.0003937689,0.01821796,0.00009447339,0.00004392649,0.0003581802,0.00001581866,0.000003872653,0.0009821504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924657,0.0002416695,0.007077695,0.00005104981,0.00006775727,0.00002343996,0.00001199743,0.000005846377,0.0000547855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3408388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2571182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0636521818125617,"score_gpt":0.3279384853436287,"score_spread":0.264286303531067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}