{"id":"W2886443927","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgy016","title":"A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Lausanne; York University; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Identification (biology); Forensic identification; Computer science; Inference; Perspective (graphical); Data science; Management science; Forensic science; Point (geometry); Field (mathematics); Empirical research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09244993,0.002759377,0.003064031,0.008797651,0.004792344,0.01829967,0.008136849,0.009461411,0.008806189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2025038,0.001729059,0.003839484,0.005716757,0.04634549,0.02427437,0.00809468,0.01150174,0.001989893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009858258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01014395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003501656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00302291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9148749,0.0484765,0.008448448,0.008124657,0.01761067,0.002464711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75043,0.1865924,0.01965605,0.02369938,0.01722826,0.002393865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009198582,0.00002092608,0.0002892752,0.0001067539,0.00002633502,0.0000451719,0.0002193379,0.002825344,0.0001034871,0.9918567,0.0005082908,0.003989185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001132266,0.00002788355,0.0001673985,0.0001529824,0.00002773784,0.00008675373,0.00009798335,0.008231126,0.0002444882,0.986487,0.004431501,0.00003383438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003542053,0.001395069,0.9691172,0.00837308,0.0003708202,0.0001963167,0.0002654503,0.0001522775,0.01658762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2479926,0.001909713,0.7410343,0.003238867,0.001472815,0.0009743219,0.0004639352,0.0001516499,0.002761727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9075501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4889278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0636521818125617,"score_gpt":0.3279384853436287,"score_spread":0.264286303531067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}