{"id":"W2886473766","doi":"10.1111/jels.12186","title":"A Rose by Any Other Name: Understanding Judicial Decisions that Do Not Cite Precedent","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Foundation (evidence); Phenomenon; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132176,0.000191335,0.0005127779,0.0001116718,0.002183094,0.0001679166,0.0003193913,0.0001033955,0.0001471809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002063297,0.0001367927,0.0002536314,0.0004031999,0.002198759,0.0004141633,0.0001710182,0.0002971041,0.00004789553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006698936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002892905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006855258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002275472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997369,0.0002001279,0.0005282182,0.0002151878,0.001222561,0.000464929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979333,0.0008222949,0.0003665966,0.00008593396,0.0005733391,0.0002184854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001002418,0.0006348021,0.07883012,0.000009266404,0.002024083,0.0001170288,0.04327982,0.000008374641,0.0003249311,0.2243008,0.6427553,0.006713006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007783044,0.0005650891,0.006670892,0.0002724208,0.0001715381,0.00001731718,0.0329871,0.000002181312,0.0001422725,0.06104758,0.8970152,0.0003301452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6009174,0.04120327,0.008526387,0.1220551,0.009555752,0.0007134685,0.0001079929,0.0001448554,0.2167758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925624,0.002522358,0.0001783507,0.001846168,0.002436744,0.000004034176,1.902823e-7,0.0000101144,0.0004396067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3916451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2462212841917908,"score_gpt":0.4361165046390323,"score_spread":0.1898952204472416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}