{"id":"W2886473766","doi":"10.1111/jels.12186","title":"A Rose by Any Other Name: Understanding Judicial Decisions that Do Not Cite Precedent","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Foundation (evidence); Phenomenon; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009940241,0.000210146,0.0005342856,0.00251831,0.003441188,0.008746484,0.001264747,0.002329336,0.005110218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05962664,0.0002767736,0.0004247477,0.003473766,0.007834051,0.01564617,0.002309821,0.002992705,0.0008141168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003655077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01510518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02176614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941233,0.003182242,0.0002709253,0.001043037,0.0009482113,0.0004323604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471365,0.03779637,0.007630877,0.003307614,0.003194962,0.0009336852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000580163,0.00009252314,0.02942477,0.0001323513,0.00003538046,0.000410555,0.02942755,0.001740451,0.0003476306,0.8824134,0.003916451,0.05200085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002293512,0.00007363439,0.05648422,0.0006584692,0.00007099662,0.0003537692,0.02232774,0.01343537,0.0006519526,0.8142522,0.0915876,0.00008096964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5596365,0.006029648,0.04397261,0.04296346,0.0003746072,0.0001014961,0.0005468332,0.00009458452,0.3462802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892337,0.001067334,0.004121139,0.001010447,0.0001196343,0.00002628382,0.000181582,0.00003486866,0.004204992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05256963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2462212841917908,"score_gpt":0.4361165046390323,"score_spread":0.1898952204472416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}