{"id":"W2886537322","doi":"10.1016/j.enganabound.2018.07.009","title":"Comparative study of time and frequency domain approaches in contact problem for the I-mode crack under harmonic loading","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematical analysis; Boundary element method; Stress intensity factor; Isotropy; Mathematics; Finite element method; Frequency domain; Time domain; Harmonic; Regularization (linguistics); Physics; Acoustics; Computer science; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000373883,0.0003407181,0.0005547968,0.0008600275,0.0004578645,0.0006218772,0.0007031055,0.001116625,0.003282849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001734877,0.0001597929,0.0004839635,0.0004609964,0.0005914456,0.0009889742,0.0005600954,0.0005708805,0.0002573392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002013997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002924655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001841331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001792492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998354,0.00005314928,0.000005551274,0.00001850836,0.00006812694,0.0000192241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990119,0.0006259691,0.00005377856,0.00006403035,0.0002092223,0.00003506259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004866426,0.0004258229,0.004748947,0.0007325879,0.00007229196,0.0005696076,0.0007444716,0.772201,0.04163583,0.06574599,0.00151989,0.1111169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004380029,0.0000390087,0.0005393301,0.00001332974,0.000006711507,0.00004537772,0.0001198174,0.9952496,0.001559912,0.00186789,0.0005487721,0.00000581047],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4683774,0.001479316,0.486256,0.0003545041,0.00009966863,0.0000858768,0.00007962403,0.0002477223,0.04301979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599366,0.0006868942,0.03433451,0.00003892522,0.00003829412,0.00003818837,0.00006566018,0.00008563881,0.004775254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003282849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01098222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03189737491965508,"score_gpt":0.2862521614999244,"score_spread":0.2543547865802693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}