{"id":"W2886537322","doi":"10.1016/j.enganabound.2018.07.009","title":"Comparative study of time and frequency domain approaches in contact problem for the I-mode crack under harmonic loading","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematical analysis; Boundary element method; Stress intensity factor; Isotropy; Mathematics; Finite element method; Frequency domain; Time domain; Harmonic; Regularization (linguistics); Physics; Acoustics; Computer science; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005154123,0.0003125714,0.0006475876,0.0003949514,0.0001052295,0.0000691904,0.0002348071,0.0000515994,0.00001790556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001983827,0.0002425653,0.00007514479,0.001183225,0.00006694131,0.0001688455,0.00004342628,0.0002333212,0.00000161057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001523461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001725522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008050137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002032835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984474,0.0000480807,0.0005280211,0.0003236287,0.0002486742,0.0004042399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999118,0.0003344107,0.00008546634,0.0003388067,0.00005131774,0.00007195587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004091802,0.0001454627,0.01153629,0.0001156444,0.004985407,0.000002600278,0.004396588,0.9688109,0.009032259,0.0002569069,0.00001059155,0.0006664204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001272434,0.0004736115,0.01822888,0.00007073072,0.0007326942,0.000002015666,0.001350891,0.975754,0.001420984,0.0002052101,0.00008563614,0.0004028855],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.609597,0.0002501502,0.3893065,0.000008649314,0.00004533144,0.0005949258,0.00001145125,0.00009133765,0.00009472805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.893576,0.000007306334,0.1061233,0.000003605772,0.0000437966,0.0001785781,0.000008511111,0.00004704966,0.00001183352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2839791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03189737491965508,"score_gpt":0.2862521614999244,"score_spread":0.2543547865802693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}