{"id":"W2886922639","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2018.07.003","title":"Can stated measures of willingness-to-accept be valid? Evidence from laboratory experiments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Alberta; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Willingness to accept; Framing (construction); Willingness to pay; Incentive compatibility; Framing effect; Incentive; Public good; Economics; Voting; Contingent valuation; Microeconomics; Experimental economics; Private good; Public economics; Prospect theory; Empirical research; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005374696,0.0001721445,0.0004076287,0.0001503324,0.00007254849,0.00003918835,0.0002310874,0.00005429978,0.0006023441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001034773,0.0001997203,0.00008660654,0.00004372241,0.000147495,0.0003462864,0.0001693575,0.00006723371,0.0000622028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003224057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008178258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008779304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001825855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984959,0.00001530233,0.0009471176,0.0003064341,0.00005168364,0.0001836104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987555,0.00002591236,0.0008237081,0.0002376573,0.00000709218,0.0001501565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006947897,0.001264401,0.9187218,0.000117229,0.002503756,0.00002411316,0.01050593,0.005924091,0.01476826,0.01827112,0.00346699,0.02373755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00228752,0.001029505,0.9286463,0.000126679,0.00010598,0.000004828837,0.002255691,0.0008813275,0.0138836,0.006749014,0.04336709,0.0006624687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960382,0.001331919,0.000632766,0.0004499659,0.0003961934,0.000208423,0.0002783676,0.000003236865,0.0006609436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854669,0.01096011,0.002798941,0.0004956248,0.0001145012,0.000008133144,0.000008246903,0.00002431491,0.0001232361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0399001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8144357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1087055806327329,"score_gpt":0.2378505587840944,"score_spread":0.1291449781513616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}