{"id":"W2886938767","doi":"10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062306","title":"Uses and Misuses of Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Science and Conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":349,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Workflow; Scale (ratio); Natural (archaeology); False positive paradox; Environmental planning; Citizen science; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007592296,0.00008013463,0.0002715288,0.00004929933,0.0001347421,0.000002832255,0.00008273171,0.00003931091,0.0000691768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002587422,0.000070815,0.00001314504,0.0001288099,0.003326754,0.0001934636,0.0003366379,0.00003050886,0.00001986879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001256172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005762057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008715397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000853653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991395,0.0000840578,0.0002868732,0.0001809564,0.0002003476,0.0001082831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995518,0.00009039125,0.0002039392,0.00009666225,0.00001556764,0.00004163487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004090956,0.00004400679,0.99524,0.001694259,0.000006608033,4.955371e-7,0.0005775858,9.173094e-8,0.001200526,0.00009038249,0.0009993199,0.0001425875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001702041,0.00015428,0.9968603,0.0006031204,0.00003475492,0.00001012202,0.001491271,0.00004457519,0.0001955072,0.0000467241,0.0003211779,0.00006802417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955202,0.003538061,0.000004414233,0.000277976,0.00003467962,0.0003267941,0.00005829862,0.000002801411,0.0002367202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891497,0.009889072,0.0006353668,0.0003023942,0.000002522825,0.000002415258,0.000001210276,0.000001152979,0.00001617691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006370565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01504121126969028,"score_gpt":0.2352477989353068,"score_spread":0.2202065876656166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}