{"id":"W2886970569","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.10263","title":"SHIFTING RESPONSIBILITIES: USING PEER ASSESSMENT IN SENIOR, ENGINEERING DESIGN TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE SUPPORT AND MEANINGFUL FEEDBACK DESPITE LARGE CLASS SIZE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Engineering Education and Pedagogy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Grading (engineering); Peer feedback; Peer assessment; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Peer review; Peer learning; Technical peer review; Mathematics education; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001699744,0.0003182622,0.0003201647,0.0006661377,0.0001459974,0.0001729704,0.0002700591,0.0002310089,0.00003394943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003431327,0.0003576739,0.00006791284,0.0009639533,0.00001865479,0.0003456034,0.00004818737,0.0004628167,0.00000813267],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004225797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007882825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001541291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003408291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980584,0.0000219601,0.0004921857,0.0003355717,0.0004188667,0.0006729625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982743,0.0003481365,0.000150767,0.0001713369,0.0006898062,0.0003656179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007018392,0.0003352418,0.356703,0.003452571,0.0007855885,0.000002581044,0.09147378,0.3624975,0.1218858,0.01639568,0.04209813,0.004299952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001093391,0.000158018,0.5664394,0.001089848,0.0001322289,0.00002730543,0.00319615,0.3402485,0.01840553,0.0001282857,0.06752869,0.001552653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990375,0.00006533613,0.002153049,0.001950069,0.002489858,0.00137466,0.00003620629,0.0002916165,0.001264208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824375,0.000003787984,0.01591927,0.0002459277,0.0003237629,0.0001487911,0.000004388608,0.0001033109,0.0008132642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2097364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009472779531638671,"score_gpt":0.2582270112857658,"score_spread":0.2487542317541271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}