{"id":"W2887285023","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2018.07.011","title":"Shale development in the US and Canada: A review of engagement practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Extractive Industries and Society","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Public engagement; Credibility; Public relations; Multitude; Shale gas; Stakeholder engagement; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public participation; Strengths and weaknesses; Community engagement; Variety (cybernetics); Limiting; Stakeholder; Sociology; Psychology; Oil shale; Social psychology; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001414258,0.0002417444,0.000480352,0.000001521488,0.0002573816,0.00001721487,0.0002777243,0.0001349555,0.0001137482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009676191,0.0001282221,0.00006853885,0.000163064,0.0005817552,0.0001060298,0.0003321168,0.0006348464,0.000002669893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004544894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001820166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05515784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004861115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984766,0.0003130609,0.0003805044,0.0002633885,0.0003645587,0.0002019249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988244,0.0005138561,0.0003830647,0.0002314381,0.000006173947,0.000041033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004605988,0.0001083223,0.0004235623,0.005247682,0.0002072758,0.00001134985,0.003455953,0.000008293429,1.244277e-7,0.0000450627,0.02283222,0.9676555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004939991,0.00002086295,0.001161434,0.003498977,0.0002149614,0.0000339772,0.002842321,0.00000575038,2.349339e-7,0.000003396009,0.9920227,0.0001460007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000928346,0.9958459,0.00002998398,0.0003333361,0.00003774242,0.0007935324,0.000008477658,0.000002554837,0.00202018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007924845,0.9973812,0.001066131,0.001013341,0.00002803657,0.00007435653,0.000006916942,0.00001236993,0.00033844],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.951134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03294004630089643,"score_gpt":0.2749672085634039,"score_spread":0.2420271622625075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}