{"id":"W2887421820","doi":"10.1002/wcc.548","title":"Data, concepts and methods for large‐<i>n</i> comparative climate change adaptation policy research: A systematic literature review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Vulnerability (computing); Empirical research; Comparative research; Conceptual framework; Sample (material); Climate change; Comparative case; Management science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1768209,0.002175048,0.007510208,0.0538729,0.003005866,0.0086751,0.005504495,0.006079582,0.01952985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4199617,0.002667522,0.007542571,0.04809027,0.005294273,0.01254223,0.007236055,0.003218266,0.00288254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01013453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05565802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008858769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01882561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8005562,0.09694333,0.07345527,0.007991275,0.01953667,0.001517283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5269426,0.3893753,0.03628447,0.02329771,0.02287437,0.001225547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001518488,0.0001078055,0.00275631,0.8204148,0.003166041,0.0003201554,0.003617144,0.0006603962,0.0003640191,0.02915022,0.0214376,0.1178537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002984031,0.0001473259,0.003060798,0.8189022,0.00429603,0.0002348619,0.005075822,0.0004766036,0.0004254463,0.02483103,0.1420754,0.0001760678],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006297057,0.6417518,0.1198176,0.01768553,0.003799798,0.155651,0.04370565,0.0004581359,0.01083344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03406041,0.2263191,0.2682036,0.008324433,0.0005405631,0.4507184,0.01051582,0.0001718559,0.001145825],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8231791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9351295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5900623923201246,"score_gpt":0.5798545865707835,"score_spread":0.0102078057493411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}