{"id":"W2887421820","doi":"10.1002/wcc.548","title":"Data, concepts and methods for large‐<i>n</i> comparative climate change adaptation policy research: A systematic literature review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Vulnerability (computing); Empirical research; Comparative research; Conceptual framework; Sample (material); Climate change; Comparative case; Management science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02224741,0.0005761534,0.001751285,0.0005642871,0.002715272,0.0004556174,0.001105402,0.0002868261,0.0001264007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001993574,0.0004826736,0.0002518921,0.002180791,0.0007245883,0.002637229,0.001721221,0.0004222179,0.0002505138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004457517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009770748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009764869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008990057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989229,0.005768473,0.001573399,0.00125496,0.0006628028,0.001511319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943295,0.001442666,0.001111015,0.001340291,0.001381296,0.0003952137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002094065,0.0003059095,0.00007771351,0.2164482,0.00009170877,0.00001189374,0.6760724,3.564752e-8,0.0001124075,0.0311818,0.0256975,0.04979108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001216311,0.001154038,0.000190385,0.4987775,0.0006335018,0.00006142537,0.08480009,0.006984401,0.0000178681,0.002778185,0.4020777,0.001308542],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005065374,0.9406266,0.002081485,0.01705163,0.001418637,0.02935926,0.004423629,0.0003028784,0.004229333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003780937,0.9661161,0.009553622,0.002914879,0.004953326,0.009764779,0.002685031,0.00008687794,0.0001444748],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5912723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5900623923201246,"score_gpt":0.5798545865707835,"score_spread":0.0102078057493411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}