{"id":"W2887441113","doi":"10.4317/jced.54310","title":"Tridimensional assessment of the dental follicle dimensions of impacted mandibular third molars using cone-beam CT","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","topic":"Dental Radiography and Imaging","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cone beam computed tomography; Molar; Coronal plane; Orthodontics; Sagittal plane; Vestibular system; Dentistry; Mandibular second molar; Medicine; Impaction; Significant difference; Mandibular first molar; Computed tomography; Anatomy; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008535466,0.0002122383,0.0007293892,0.0001204953,0.0002112039,0.00005097226,0.0003534633,0.0001027674,0.0001943179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001212034,0.0001370166,0.0008189072,0.0002887821,0.001051743,0.0003719064,0.0003057103,0.0004529965,0.000004081432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004031241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001327216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005466779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005095788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966207,0.0002298448,0.001842221,0.0002374079,0.0008165881,0.0002532917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976482,0.0002175104,0.001392321,0.0002901714,0.000208041,0.0002437481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003668554,0.001013395,0.5086922,0.00002755095,0.000430295,0.000250739,0.00005627258,0.000009969471,0.4879187,0.0001088324,0.0009659346,0.0001592173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004149893,0.000606126,0.5499735,0.0003534889,0.0002545175,0.005303232,0.0009626074,0.0005728838,0.437237,0.000172769,0.0002251076,0.0001888673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947553,0.001308341,0.0001220524,0.00002209389,0.003341746,0.0001373222,0.00005212819,0.000006834482,0.0002541636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978167,0.00005601995,0.001634663,0.0001040738,0.0002773988,8.196841e-7,0.000002985295,0.00001899259,0.00008831769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05068177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5587375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04740646173480424,"score_gpt":0.4141883019180603,"score_spread":0.366781840183256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}