{"id":"W2887625360","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2018.08.019","title":"Assessing Benefit vs Risk of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in People With Chronic Kidney Disease","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Amgen Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Conventional PCI; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Internal medicine; Revascularization; Cardiology; Angina; Coronary occlusion; Randomized controlled trial; Kidney disease; Observational study; Adverse effect; Occlusion; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002820948,0.0002451155,0.001097327,0.0006115827,0.001090459,0.001559995,0.0006141558,0.006213853,0.003035305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03741513,0.0002413269,0.0006552675,0.0008650582,0.0006942787,0.001350233,0.0005060722,0.007276742,0.0006637131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002183996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002561932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01353026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02775557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997066,0.001428391,0.0006145571,0.0001928227,0.0004186016,0.0002797524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812448,0.01463594,0.0009314718,0.0002407963,0.001707841,0.001239121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004420823,0.0007048537,0.5369099,0.0009192517,0.0007387835,0.01834209,0.001887371,0.000753828,0.0007814924,0.007171026,0.2679986,0.159372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004870124,0.003482858,0.5389354,0.006896318,0.002917114,0.05180531,0.01003924,0.01091252,0.00162513,0.09095515,0.2770043,0.0005565957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.08786076,0.01278879,0.0003679252,0.8739842,0.006229224,0.00006962176,0.0005939872,0.00002677781,0.01807864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.615151,0.008936879,0.00200702,0.3310483,0.03922533,0.0001180801,0.0003061479,0.00002778425,0.003179477],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01353026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02690297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0190521316796483,"score_gpt":0.2719133353672811,"score_spread":0.2528612036876328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}