{"id":"W2887754593","doi":"10.15530/urtec-2018-2902799","title":"Use of Rate-Transient Analysis Techniques for Evaluating Experimental Core Permeability Tests for Unconventional Reservoirs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the 6th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference","topic":"Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Transient analysis; Permeability (electromagnetism); Transient (computer programming); Petroleum engineering; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Geology; Engineering; Transient response; Electrical engineering; Telecommunications; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009052322,0.0004609946,0.0003345623,0.0008664924,0.0004073146,0.0004355222,0.000735378,0.0004851699,0.0008846544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003277941,0.0002725561,0.0002775667,0.0005891768,0.0003139383,0.0008851768,0.0003311757,0.0004734324,0.000171088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005873156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004395768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00136451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002726664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995247,0.0001284974,0.00004108954,0.00006000851,0.0002022691,0.00004341966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973637,0.001388494,0.0003138719,0.000255701,0.0006223941,0.0000558065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008380131,0.0004277689,0.009476314,0.000166944,0.00002788512,0.0001227814,0.0003388228,0.0285167,0.9009718,0.0009063104,0.000221335,0.05798531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003526989,0.0007992519,0.01032881,0.00001386176,0.00003947028,0.0001312871,0.00009668527,0.1566192,0.8309634,0.0002788729,0.000660799,0.00003308093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.875874,0.0001598753,0.1203222,0.00005994099,0.00002381956,0.00008968353,0.0001872611,0.0006011224,0.002682134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904992,0.00003896691,0.009057159,0.000006214297,0.0000019401,0.00002862699,0.00004511661,0.00002990108,0.0002929528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00136451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004787385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06311607644669778,"score_gpt":0.3216885644456021,"score_spread":0.2585724879989043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}