{"id":"W2887784452","doi":"10.1177/0309324718791095","title":"Fracture response of double cantilever beam subject to thermal fatigue","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","topic":"Fire effects on concrete materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cantilever; Materials science; Thermal; Degradation (telecommunications); Joint (building); Structural engineering; Composite material; Beam (structure); Adhesive; Thermal fatigue; Fracture (geology); Cohesive zone model; Engineering; Electronic engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002628363,0.0002804991,0.0003702615,0.0002371893,0.0001797316,0.0001624676,0.0003556257,0.0006529892,0.002554023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005755213,0.0002255692,0.0001871876,0.0001532869,0.0002989256,0.0002340387,0.0002541222,0.0002866873,0.0002228828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001639852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001813749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001580221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003063497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99986,0.000009641466,0.000007034111,0.00002731151,0.00006565263,0.00003026351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997415,0.00008687303,0.00003698478,0.00003196328,0.00007032275,0.00003243444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003847885,0.00007449689,0.004306945,0.00008145144,0.00002494344,0.0004858262,0.0001705768,0.0148705,0.9724516,0.0001368823,0.0001754027,0.006836686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005919949,0.002832933,0.08711284,0.00005186132,0.00004851173,0.0006929882,0.0005189433,0.3304797,0.5768493,0.000248093,0.001034443,0.0000711674],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977549,0.00008795988,0.001728101,0.00001675481,0.00000749626,0.000006063487,0.00008685209,0.00002543024,0.0002865547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980755,0.00007089242,0.001058975,0.00001367554,0.000002170988,0.00001295881,0.00009673991,0.000007918964,0.0006611818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002554023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008544087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0225136218590783,"score_gpt":0.2494349114423863,"score_spread":0.226921289583308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}