{"id":"W2887872922","doi":"10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i4.936","title":"Sensitising Green Criminology to Procedural Environmental Justice: A Case Study of First Nation Consultation in the Canadian Oil Sands","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental justice; Indigenous; Injustice; Deliberation; Procedural justice; Scholarship; Victimisation; Criminology; Restorative justice; Sociology; Green criminology; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Political science; Criminal justice; Law; Poison control; Psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Politics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006411469,0.0007124008,0.000698216,0.00185273,0.06941048,0.007418795,0.003425555,0.006330799,0.003777643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01192348,0.0005623049,0.0005046735,0.003451022,0.02756125,0.002799823,0.00950016,0.00651643,0.0002505931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07440047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05845529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8826435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868804,0.00682439,0.0001584985,0.0005436823,0.001324087,0.004268957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894311,0.007001241,0.0004982186,0.0002539769,0.0009773214,0.001838051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003787631,0.00007357128,0.002198436,0.00008539702,0.000006461927,0.006799561,0.9711986,0.0003380181,0.0004426479,0.01239323,0.001245953,0.005180382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004432035,0.00002113577,0.00185454,0.00007344082,0.00000552243,0.0004192706,0.9835232,0.0002258364,0.0001958029,0.0008998023,0.01275498,0.00002197083],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562142,0.0005316245,0.001399858,0.007733599,0.00005567397,0.0001817287,0.00003979048,0.00001796289,0.03382557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99319,0.0003159154,0.0006923146,0.0007860998,0.000009550697,0.0000531153,0.0000123702,0.00001658859,0.004924067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1173565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5398157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08816356565538122,"score_gpt":0.344978810419129,"score_spread":0.2568152447637478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}