{"id":"W2888440094","doi":"10.1098/rsnr.2018.0020","title":"John Wallis and the Catholics: confessional and theological antagonism in Wallis's mathematics and philosophy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Confessional; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Natural philosophy; Church Fathers; Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Doctrine; Scholasticism; Annals; Classics; Theology; Acknowledgement; Orthodoxy; Sociology; Law; History; Epistemology; Politics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002339958,0.000114877,0.0002499229,0.00003207382,0.001178354,0.00006480896,0.0004689292,0.00004681223,0.00003951323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002128791,0.00004529977,0.00009318852,0.00006410077,0.02571216,0.000179729,0.0002219496,0.0003216651,3.500207e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008382821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001239467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001136157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002802182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988818,0.00007847284,0.0003225966,0.0001590715,0.0003906582,0.0001674257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988146,0.0004710018,0.0003308436,0.0001383443,0.0001634371,0.00008174284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000195389,0.0001866181,0.001142418,0.0001065658,0.00003917397,0.000002962998,0.4629477,0.00001229298,0.0008391999,0.5233688,0.004482725,0.00667613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002960807,0.001134046,0.008881181,0.0005508885,0.0001883866,0.0002343423,0.0108505,0.0192386,0.0001310771,0.8154982,0.1397359,0.0005960501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.954856,0.009701835,0.00007145938,0.01640698,0.002569876,0.0002114929,0.000008744762,0.000006215517,0.01616739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967244,0.0006762844,0.0004114872,0.0006840614,0.0003838926,0.000001112663,3.351435e-8,0.000003871303,0.001114902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4520972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03455671153992738,"score_gpt":0.2271481767934486,"score_spread":0.1925914652535212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}