{"id":"W2888519339","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-95921-4_8","title":"Quantitative Evaluation of Correction Methods and Simulation of Motion Artifacts for Rotary Pullback Imaging Catheters","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Communications in computer and information science","topic":"Optical Coherence Tomography Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ground truth; Computer vision; Imaging phantom; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Image registration; Image quality; Motion (physics); Rotation around a fixed axis; Motion estimation; Image (mathematics); Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001926453,0.0001254222,0.0001869567,0.0006874683,0.0001209183,0.00005052326,0.0002983228,0.0000705428,0.000008028881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001338117,0.000138241,0.0000356414,0.0002853308,0.0007575534,0.001812605,0.0001272845,0.0001255281,0.000001909749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008527867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005840986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004864396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005405471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988818,0.00004063974,0.0005950358,0.0001298607,0.0002550297,0.00009766721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975742,0.0004990817,0.0002749225,0.0005490783,0.00106455,0.00003818782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009325751,0.0000159997,0.00006493979,0.0001302155,0.00001692223,2.941635e-9,0.002652477,0.2158861,0.0002107179,0.02316852,0.00003736721,0.7578074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001685173,0.00004679846,0.001385508,0.000133315,0.00003611041,9.04878e-7,0.00007008895,0.9871613,0.0002601945,0.009852163,0.0007696313,0.0001154759],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004405524,0.0003758656,0.978411,0.00004077901,0.0002035922,0.001028998,0.00002968927,0.00004100284,0.01546361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7363864,0.0003980262,0.2629814,0.00002029006,0.00001162496,0.00008191325,0.0000936536,0.00001110319,0.00001561703],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7712752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5637303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09248917575035341,"score_gpt":0.3985899606344506,"score_spread":0.3061007848840972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}