{"id":"W2888519339","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-95921-4_8","title":"Quantitative Evaluation of Correction Methods and Simulation of Motion Artifacts for Rotary Pullback Imaging Catheters","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Communications in computer and information science","topic":"Optical Coherence Tomography Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ground truth; Computer vision; Imaging phantom; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Image registration; Image quality; Motion (physics); Rotation around a fixed axis; Motion estimation; Image (mathematics); Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001649853,0.0008856686,0.0003856503,0.0007175578,0.0002326087,0.00161371,0.0009585936,0.0008428466,0.002329956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01024442,0.0003370384,0.000307344,0.0006827254,0.000369869,0.0007972388,0.0005181941,0.0004842096,0.0002924148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006546208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006290873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001856697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001266374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992633,0.0002494942,0.00004717584,0.00006410084,0.000343288,0.00003253502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936261,0.004554499,0.0004100857,0.000431836,0.0009171899,0.00006036142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001860464,0.0002397888,0.003969022,0.0009962525,0.0001217574,0.0003177721,0.0004775231,0.3333983,0.2082611,0.008788519,0.00360292,0.4379666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003808187,0.0002659759,0.001953421,0.00005722019,0.0000495021,0.0004221052,0.00005281616,0.901059,0.09282621,0.0009633556,0.002262503,0.00004988711],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1422361,0.002271871,0.8487659,0.0002617623,0.0001074037,0.0001680858,0.0002739559,0.002266861,0.003647943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5834677,0.0008562406,0.4118108,0.0000639108,0.00003086504,0.00009324292,0.0003078785,0.0006801391,0.002689189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002329956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008725405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09248917575035341,"score_gpt":0.3985899606344506,"score_spread":0.3061007848840972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}