{"id":"W2888681580","doi":"10.1111/bioe.12471","title":"Enriching the concept of vulnerability in research ethics: An integrative and functional account","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Operationalization; Pragmatism; Normative; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Vulnerability assessment; Bioethics; Epistemology; Categorical variable; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychological resilience; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05548755,0.000106653,0.0002534645,0.0001531525,0.0003585724,0.00003932647,0.0002510318,0.0009651792,0.0001561079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1112436,0.00006378511,0.00004430072,0.0004768836,0.01336072,0.0001022253,0.0003121053,0.01478371,0.00001182165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000131509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001945338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002593265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01205586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943768,0.002360162,0.0004800864,0.000444875,0.002010245,0.0003277786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172786,0.0772407,0.0001026941,0.000920192,0.004255861,0.0002019209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001309652,0.0005925322,0.04265929,0.0002928368,0.00006201104,0.00001010993,0.0765682,0.000003336103,0.006705008,0.8627085,0.0003982077,0.008690306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002265893,0.004901756,0.2142779,0.001247688,0.00002546889,0.00001987936,0.07182075,0.001672309,0.02355155,0.6760355,0.003911931,0.0002693788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.934747,0.0005321018,0.0005827709,0.0582907,0.0002687725,0.0006054076,0.00001692403,0.00002290638,0.004933361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964207,0.0004924536,0.0009427397,0.001335641,0.0004079838,0.00001892167,0.000006745805,0.00001321059,0.0003615797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1866731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8158008063683997,"score_gpt":0.6762404547285794,"score_spread":0.1395603516398203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}