{"id":"W2888945442","doi":"10.1071/wr18006","title":"Evaluating wildlife management by using principles of applied ecology: case studies and implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Canberra","keywords":"Wildlife management; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biodiversity; Landscape ecology; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Geography; Environmental planning; Biology; Habitat; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002598938,0.0001200474,0.0001892259,0.000106282,0.0008417175,0.00001909754,0.0002081784,0.00009162012,0.0001583327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002204445,0.0001135279,0.00002177775,0.0004901052,0.001672909,0.0001265113,0.0007565062,0.0001800132,0.00009001612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001892875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003373517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001047485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001815494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981954,0.0002268367,0.0003307473,0.0004473239,0.0003734978,0.0004262121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989347,0.0004053247,0.0001136214,0.0003569894,0.00008985314,0.00009949892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101983,0.0001857333,0.9440107,0.0001138666,0.0001917555,0.00003821325,0.00172137,0.0003125594,0.003420407,0.004755548,0.02919376,0.01595405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002209968,0.001069607,0.9370074,0.0001189332,0.0001893739,0.0004884215,0.008851543,0.01530141,0.0006610642,0.01086343,0.02250726,0.0007315886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920539,0.00006772777,0.00007229595,0.001943515,0.0000454611,0.0006145757,0.000006765511,0.00002343334,0.005172348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920666,0.0001103789,0.006168509,0.00102662,0.00006039376,0.0001366624,0.000003987559,0.00001411593,0.0004127664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01522246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6473896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2057947941787565,"score_gpt":0.4402277568286461,"score_spread":0.2344329626498896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}