{"id":"W2889056253","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2017-0047.r2","title":"The Influence of Witness Intoxication, Witness Race, and Defendant Race on Mock Juror Decision Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Eyewitness testimony; Verdict; Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Indigenous; Race (biology); Criminology; White (mutation); Social psychology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00360924,0.0003380074,0.0005791513,0.0006496739,0.00184315,0.000212387,0.001159778,0.0004757507,0.00003646387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02460191,0.0002961022,0.00009085706,0.0002979694,0.004716039,0.0004212275,0.00009782316,0.0009106416,0.000006470782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005383833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004823414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003586892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1185649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963389,0.0007564495,0.0008633255,0.0004693887,0.0002536743,0.001318235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900535,0.005914493,0.0008659997,0.0004465596,0.001677289,0.001042146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001341883,0.00008731562,0.003731795,0.001276267,0.0001572743,0.001411988,0.1085713,0.001407754,0.0006154103,0.6956688,0.001338959,0.1843912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00163916,0.0024965,0.4797494,0.002810905,0.008272459,0.006955586,0.3083616,0.0002687236,0.0007240082,0.1600845,0.0273588,0.001278441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881218,0.002093188,0.003575952,0.003699728,0.0006307008,0.0001956733,0.00001614979,0.00002018217,0.001646607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937245,0.001633264,0.002915396,0.001162625,0.0003545644,0.00001160974,9.838074e-7,0.0000321264,0.0001649437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5355844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07620801820199738,"score_gpt":0.3588550105829719,"score_spread":0.2826469923809746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}