{"id":"W2889118929","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2018-0237","title":"Energy code compliant house design for lowest lifecycle cost based on market-available technologies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Envelope (radar); Building envelope; Code (set theory); Architectural engineering; Building code; Energy (signal processing); Engineering; Environmental economics; Reliability engineering; Civil engineering; Computer science; Telecommunications; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003833901,0.0002316382,0.0002782643,0.0006403463,0.0001115935,0.0001067455,0.0003404314,0.0001170735,0.0001507974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001667505,0.0002392167,0.00009269244,0.0002812174,0.00005160785,0.000127119,0.000007096941,0.0002013416,0.000008695542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005366519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004939973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009702057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00334977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987893,0.0000144636,0.0003123122,0.0001368305,0.0001444961,0.0006026118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989567,0.0002125042,0.00006519344,0.0002405215,0.0001799124,0.0003452033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002970717,0.00001239995,0.00009337592,0.0001115099,0.00006966806,0.0001341882,0.00002867561,0.8710099,0.001246954,0.0003541384,0.1246498,0.002259687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006080811,0.0003027865,0.00006427985,0.0003710029,0.00002338283,0.00003584577,0.00006937648,0.7995661,0.008201852,0.0001027147,0.1903525,0.0003021279],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005843278,0.0007057054,0.9948588,0.0001571185,0.0009530376,0.0002247682,0.0000230522,0.0003582891,0.002134884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913104,0.00003017914,0.008040983,0.00007386263,0.0002258305,0.00003060779,0.000001177872,0.0001148062,0.0001721373],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9754973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01778889667621683,"score_gpt":0.2059101821693697,"score_spread":0.1881212854931529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}