{"id":"W2889213083","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsy019","title":"Addressing the needs of Canadians with rare diseases: an evaluation of orphan drug incentives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Government of Canada; Ontario Genomics; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Orphan drug; Voucher; Incentive; Subsidy; Public economics; Business; Drug; Pharmaceutical industry; Order (exchange); Investment (military); Medicine; Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Pharmacology; Political science; Accounting; Bioinformatics; Law; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02930457,0.000680708,0.001026647,0.002365706,0.008551937,0.006933285,0.002047734,0.003851116,0.00505773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07744033,0.0003065466,0.001540359,0.004301909,0.003494451,0.002562761,0.003997775,0.002932384,0.0001979466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2368526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8854971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9452054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9638129,0.01358576,0.0009480619,0.000630293,0.01466748,0.006355482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9267703,0.03303539,0.004300185,0.001085429,0.02704162,0.00776704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00686894,0.003261696,0.09633125,0.006805382,0.001169631,0.001227174,0.01296119,0.01895265,0.001834959,0.4037844,0.09157226,0.3552305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005873533,0.008026182,0.2627677,0.01068481,0.005021713,0.0007993426,0.0699376,0.02724894,0.003947763,0.05898905,0.5455343,0.001169172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.525325,0.01454314,0.002928,0.1059524,0.0006238804,0.004096942,0.002393092,0.00008332137,0.3440541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646015,0.00750707,0.005829814,0.01414899,0.00014186,0.0007142653,0.0004915202,0.00002142705,0.0065435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1145029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8059236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1253909957631091,"score_gpt":0.3372190769577353,"score_spread":0.2118280811946262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}