{"id":"W2889263021","doi":"10.1016/j.jcde.2018.08.004","title":"Finite element method for the static and dynamic analysis of FRP guyed tower","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Design and Engineering","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Manitoba Hydro; University of Windsor","keywords":"Structural engineering; Finite element method; Fibre-reinforced plastic; Equilateral triangle; Serviceability (structure); Engineering; Tower; Vibration; Static analysis; Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000712754,0.0005944519,0.0006819665,0.0006433796,0.0004411373,0.0005888998,0.001196031,0.001351535,0.007000191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008562339,0.0005896686,0.001094084,0.0003980161,0.0003884575,0.0004873505,0.0005792785,0.001043747,0.00210899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005100921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001048245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004150716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005878332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999627,0.00008768448,0.0000183089,0.00003571792,0.0002076243,0.00002366518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995989,0.0001774233,0.00003398946,0.00003277475,0.0001421902,0.0000147447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006869824,0.00009465198,0.0009959516,0.000239903,0.00005003645,0.0001820044,0.0002105372,0.9105025,0.02335316,0.01072213,0.001718829,0.05186156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000587056,0.00002383609,0.0001462511,0.00002065106,0.000004143565,0.00002442319,0.00002078761,0.9951305,0.001027038,0.0004521685,0.003138623,0.000005630935],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009185694,0.0001828114,0.9848725,0.00008475826,0.00004827501,0.0001076189,0.000152648,0.0004389619,0.004926802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2680352,0.0005296299,0.7092842,0.00009509281,0.00003163534,0.0009771625,0.0006965952,0.0003114371,0.02003899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007000191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02341795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01001401819369631,"score_gpt":0.2484417148035347,"score_spread":0.2384276966098384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}