{"id":"W2889272343","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0033","title":"The hydraulics of constitutional claims: Multiplicity of actors in constitutional interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Constitutional law; Law; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Epistemology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06197947,0.0005900628,0.001762159,0.006407572,0.02556105,0.03533091,0.003724749,0.009706509,0.006496347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07213087,0.001957858,0.001316767,0.004156485,0.1675441,0.05325221,0.02706673,0.01248521,0.000606445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02130193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01529076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0145728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01166346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9266146,0.04836223,0.00255795,0.006396876,0.01045,0.005618368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088785,0.07315365,0.004516357,0.007732266,0.002873514,0.002845795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009590688,0.000006165114,0.0006777934,0.00001841285,0.000007453026,0.0001492846,0.02469698,0.0001897026,0.00008188566,0.9703395,0.0003525736,0.003470646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030164,0.0000144382,0.0006501882,0.0001238628,0.00002232256,0.0001319517,0.01632709,0.001073364,0.0002389474,0.962372,0.01897454,0.00004110491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2130958,0.006223658,0.1726035,0.1227723,0.0004930684,0.0002470739,0.0001070636,0.0003055719,0.484152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881136,0.0004550296,0.006929053,0.001054476,0.0002028351,0.000123339,0.00001907284,0.00007081812,0.003031869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06197947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3277826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01452181428740458,"score_gpt":0.2579335399891207,"score_spread":0.2434117257017162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}