{"id":"W2889275798","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v8n6p193","title":"“Leda and the Swan”’s Revisions: A Cognitive Stylistic Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive grammar; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Poetry; Cognition; Stanza; Grammar; Cognitive linguistics; Literature; Realization (probability); Literary criticism; Psychology; Philosophy; Art; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002110775,0.0003796947,0.0002258916,0.002461723,0.002407483,0.004865757,0.0008728651,0.0009946608,0.001088175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007041359,0.00023045,0.0003382278,0.001229146,0.01487284,0.00435429,0.001952058,0.001750854,0.0001271579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003247372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001172368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004070391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005090606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980647,0.001227425,0.00006603268,0.0001558506,0.0003786772,0.0001073046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966497,0.002415211,0.0002702952,0.00026866,0.0003215506,0.00007465969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004476017,0.00002146284,0.001101388,0.00005555935,0.000009352904,0.0003746868,0.1479386,0.0006632146,0.00127906,0.8381193,0.0009507242,0.009441817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004429517,0.0001085955,0.009644021,0.0001851335,0.00004483565,0.001298355,0.1072515,0.02071687,0.003153331,0.7161978,0.1412776,0.00007765205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6909997,0.0011481,0.0658456,0.006492006,0.0002277992,0.0002103162,0.0001358139,0.0001490143,0.2347916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992474,0.0001598078,0.005184099,0.00007449373,0.0000260011,0.00002523969,0.00002521981,0.00002008142,0.002011032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004865757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02356142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01851054979259892,"score_gpt":0.3387715376815579,"score_spread":0.320260987888959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}