{"id":"W2889451971","doi":"10.1177/1362480618787173","title":"Understanding animal (ab)use: Green criminological contributions, missed opportunities and a way forward","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Criminology","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Green criminology; Criminology; Environmentalism; Animal rights; Sociology; Wildlife; Poaching; Criminalization; Environmental justice; Environmental ethics; Criminal justice; Political science; Ecology; Politics; Biology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003224082,0.0002489856,0.0003416256,0.00009353471,0.0004640797,0.00005054121,0.0002813415,0.000365798,0.00637442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006267272,0.0002074239,0.0000729551,0.00009319844,0.009820955,0.0002225029,0.000361102,0.0002787406,0.0003532889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001364595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002430368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001122811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003091921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980034,0.0003201363,0.000349724,0.0005036905,0.0001905963,0.0006324318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987814,0.000528416,0.00008441996,0.0003075722,0.00004612853,0.0002520215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002481668,0.00007525896,0.005696709,0.00000576271,0.00003798745,0.0000360534,0.0003268594,3.215104e-7,0.001920987,0.9849755,0.005738108,0.0009383432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001858921,0.002075919,0.1205471,0.00002620533,0.0005476939,0.0005846033,0.004479671,0.002215678,0.004837483,0.8404,0.02147612,0.0009505848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481298,0.00005712921,0.00895733,0.02398658,0.0001069159,0.0001772405,0.00002161861,0.0001866814,0.0183767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918274,0.00009444384,0.0005251733,0.007089727,0.00007941283,0.00001611196,0.00001775923,0.00001525242,0.0003347278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1445755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3287876204980659,"score_gpt":0.31997031923792,"score_spread":0.008817301260145904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}