{"id":"W2889886938","doi":"10.18438/eblip29449","title":"A re-examination of online journal quality and investigation of the possible impact of poor electronic surrogate quality on researchers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Impact factor; Electronic journal; Web of science; Computer science; Electronic publishing; World Wide Web; Library science; The Internet; MEDLINE; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3115956,0.0005652022,0.001167264,0.01210239,0.003352338,0.01431916,0.004155283,0.001839675,0.007472428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6242512,0.000943017,0.001666201,0.01641778,0.007167022,0.01623138,0.008037022,0.002636449,0.001441763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01015811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01198318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006374225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007868695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6653505,0.1641325,0.05203212,0.009980998,0.1045532,0.00395071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1247539,0.4019159,0.1714171,0.105878,0.192361,0.003674061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001596076,0.0006683713,0.516574,0.008786804,0.001173472,0.0009310215,0.04390448,0.001337915,0.003073876,0.01964155,0.01751512,0.3847974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003267936,0.002633284,0.6736305,0.01579759,0.001265778,0.002076433,0.07553121,0.003822373,0.02046801,0.01529953,0.1887361,0.000412258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7849567,0.02296774,0.04077361,0.08404552,0.003631219,0.002334567,0.003680382,0.0006566446,0.05695365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484562,0.004042011,0.03080862,0.007919709,0.001196862,0.0007371045,0.0009510188,0.0002919213,0.005596643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8489252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2224800625534798,"score_gpt":0.4675956125956807,"score_spread":0.2451155500422008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}