{"id":"W2889886938","doi":"10.18438/eblip29449","title":"A re-examination of online journal quality and investigation of the possible impact of poor electronic surrogate quality on researchers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Impact factor; Electronic journal; Web of science; Computer science; Electronic publishing; World Wide Web; Library science; The Internet; MEDLINE; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02112657,0.00006936699,0.0001481562,0.0003217397,0.0001678714,0.0002982713,0.0004132032,0.00003599914,0.0001027133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03081271,0.00004218856,0.00005113089,0.001163028,0.0003434943,0.04327802,0.0001852563,0.000178167,0.000003072231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000195736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004696945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006056302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001297923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955235,0.002005663,0.001015339,0.0001480699,0.001183216,0.0001242247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902695,0.006620062,0.001982342,0.0004876659,0.0005625147,0.00007788295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007625115,0.0006238031,0.1716633,0.000743078,0.0002211813,8.589826e-7,0.0133826,0.003344108,0.006447581,0.2324294,0.01734366,0.5461753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003823319,0.0006947325,0.9704905,0.0002452112,0.00001340031,0.000002190142,0.003021854,0.01284459,0.007336856,0.002017292,0.002885459,0.00006554392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835462,0.00007284707,0.0009670558,0.0142786,0.00008423372,0.0001636484,0.00004516764,0.000007340825,0.0008349207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975535,0.00009714594,0.0008954892,0.001342025,0.00002066889,7.094625e-7,0.00001468137,0.0000016881,0.00007409634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7988272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2224800625534798,"score_gpt":0.4675956125956807,"score_spread":0.2451155500422008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}