{"id":"W2890093726","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0202902","title":"Optimization of an ecological integrity monitoring program for protected areas: Case study for a network of national parks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Sépaq; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Environmental resource management; Relevance (law); Ecological indicator; Computer science; Environmental monitoring; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006498959,0.0006515402,0.0003501105,0.001476323,0.001822257,0.001684138,0.001527254,0.001087772,0.00093747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01076697,0.0003392002,0.0004733676,0.001845018,0.0007104906,0.001367046,0.001175793,0.0007782558,0.00009783894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009452598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007255751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1664461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2138176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951628,0.002918079,0.0001662882,0.000376978,0.0007681749,0.0006075703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925885,0.003461196,0.0009074567,0.0005395484,0.001702968,0.0008003532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000818021,0.003981281,0.2578822,0.0008695971,0.0002393574,0.006039978,0.004178097,0.4648858,0.008659033,0.008734054,0.003111778,0.2406008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004902143,0.004892939,0.1804503,0.0002925505,0.0003705874,0.001632084,0.01218906,0.7701989,0.01156513,0.002516751,0.01522621,0.0001753545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672628,0.0002397846,0.02353655,0.0006005722,0.00001099991,0.001940408,0.0002539257,0.0001932818,0.005961847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257427,0.0002085083,0.07118963,0.00006034582,0.0000116764,0.0006231507,0.000285557,0.00002789007,0.001850437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1664461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3309547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06559558211012735,"score_gpt":0.292071426680768,"score_spread":0.2264758445706406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}