{"id":"W2890153344","doi":"10.1289/ehp3067","title":"Weight of Evidence for Hazard Identification: A Critical Review of the Literature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Health Perspectives","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Agency (philosophy); Identification (biology); Relevance (law); Management science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Medicine; Political science; Business; Sociology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2578073,0.003567728,0.00960604,0.08221126,0.004804344,0.01866867,0.007327653,0.01003225,0.003298838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.594551,0.003893748,0.00905256,0.03809968,0.009667787,0.01874783,0.008384706,0.009236393,0.000931813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02993994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07631365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005997822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01153666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6669485,0.1600922,0.09743754,0.009774948,0.06335568,0.002391207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.237054,0.6132037,0.06196652,0.009970757,0.07478444,0.003020645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002931135,0.00007631104,0.00168674,0.7140424,0.003750996,0.000522037,0.005662201,0.0005177317,0.0006826147,0.006465024,0.0142775,0.2520234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007381025,0.0000999105,0.001053424,0.9475418,0.004012988,0.0003972453,0.002189775,0.0002554327,0.0003123018,0.006797705,0.03717288,0.00009265695],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001148904,0.9674236,0.005381534,0.01791043,0.00333693,0.003111301,0.0002860971,0.0000637387,0.001337578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0356094,0.9017378,0.04237375,0.008284834,0.002158531,0.008884512,0.0004355683,0.00007224414,0.0004433461],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7421927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9152558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8022942221032542,"score_gpt":0.6205444760223301,"score_spread":0.1817497460809241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}