{"id":"W2890179035","doi":"10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.007","title":"Evaluation of sustainable scrubbing agents for ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioresource Technology","topic":"Phosphorus and nutrient management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Data scrubbing; Digestate; Citric acid; Chemistry; Ammonia; Acetic acid; Sulfuric acid; Waste management; Anaerobic digestion; Pulp and paper industry; Food science; Inorganic chemistry; Organic chemistry; Methane; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006983172,0.0004950094,0.0005195581,0.0004146269,0.0003781098,0.000652865,0.0003762356,0.0004189011,0.001106441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006437789,0.0001953585,0.0003916757,0.0002981071,0.0002168891,0.0004937419,0.0003796699,0.0002718403,0.0002171641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005014394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007638646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001494315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00415808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993887,0.0001716561,0.00004891681,0.00005642066,0.0002527189,0.00008152493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996912,0.00006796099,0.00005031597,0.00001857968,0.0001312933,0.0000406493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001756438,0.0009330509,0.0006725746,0.0003993685,0.00004699395,0.0000781563,0.00005441405,0.001831181,0.9797773,0.0001457271,0.00005680885,0.01424802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004726486,0.004299331,0.001148443,0.00001931395,0.00005599198,0.0000299596,0.00007431701,0.00175141,0.9911891,0.00003235833,0.001344161,0.00000837824],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972401,0.0009010368,0.0006497731,0.00001824965,0.00001138543,0.00006903043,0.00007373226,0.000008720985,0.001027938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922957,0.001706267,0.003275746,0.00001733063,0.000008958066,0.00006916322,0.0001734181,0.00001086347,0.002442569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001494315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003701389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01919648325049912,"score_gpt":0.2566313931940427,"score_spread":0.2374349099435436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}