{"id":"W2890181382","doi":"10.1111/jep.13026","title":"Assessing the methodological quality of the Canadian Psychiatric Association's anxiety and depression clinical practice guidelines","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Clinical practice guidelines implementation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Anxiety; Clinical Practice; Guideline; Best practice; Strengths and weaknesses; Depression (economics); Quality (philosophy); Association (psychology); Psychiatry; Medicine; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Family medicine; Psychotherapist","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.673458,0.001633634,0.004100244,0.02804305,0.006834926,0.01114599,0.00684369,0.004414327,0.002481365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8710893,0.003203579,0.004810323,0.02758134,0.009611095,0.003126837,0.009276239,0.003265358,0.000277704],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04685317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1345754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1889061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3049891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1965092,0.4146952,0.2216431,0.01814306,0.1457785,0.00323091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09262043,0.486724,0.1066912,0.04377906,0.2656023,0.004582961],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002654972,0.000749735,0.3721671,0.1128972,0.01925071,0.0003702164,0.05550149,0.004477308,0.001279771,0.0269057,0.04079768,0.362948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008525435,0.002879002,0.4599185,0.1847697,0.02953685,0.001049721,0.02243824,0.02625849,0.005147336,0.04034074,0.2175324,0.001603566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2228631,0.1342923,0.1739539,0.05631194,0.009773583,0.3377933,0.01641587,0.0007643706,0.04783172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5237834,0.00913937,0.3146836,0.005804732,0.0005698023,0.1414516,0.003524035,0.0001366707,0.0009067637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4026845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7651929175913669,"score_gpt":0.7314887365371147,"score_spread":0.03370418105425221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}