{"id":"W2890290588","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.aat2201","title":"The origins of human prosociality: Cultural group selection in the workplace and the laboratory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Advances","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institut Universitaire de France; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Group (periodic table); Competition (biology); Group selection; Psychology; Social psychology; Biology; Ecology; Chemistry; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002893933,0.0002058085,0.0003124028,0.0006821943,0.0009983791,0.001636139,0.0005205066,0.0007317617,0.002559036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009427072,0.0002175795,0.0001573378,0.000291035,0.004429589,0.001048641,0.001553956,0.0007367735,0.0002613283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005731597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005056498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00136837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001958387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973376,0.001933717,0.00004566387,0.0002701137,0.0002754635,0.0001373652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918281,0.00396301,0.001502246,0.001286164,0.0003110755,0.001109392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003085539,0.005701787,0.6868514,0.0003389168,0.0003020025,0.001726448,0.01966164,0.001101092,0.07135117,0.05269666,0.002050183,0.1551332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000216945,0.002886716,0.9127487,0.0002243284,0.0001187124,0.001246721,0.01524666,0.003102713,0.007262115,0.05066621,0.006156243,0.000124009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931097,0.0004612903,0.001091075,0.0007660792,0.0000168547,0.00001048652,0.0000160645,0.000006843638,0.00452154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989503,0.000110899,0.0005403088,0.0001387961,0.00001190903,0.00001289004,0.000008386574,0.000003149041,0.0002233876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002893933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0153048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02351638476530479,"score_gpt":0.3826331499350014,"score_spread":0.3591167651696967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}