{"id":"W2890562588","doi":"10.1093/dote/doy089.ps01.173","title":"PS01.173: MANAGEMENT OF INTRATHORACIC AND CERVICAL ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Diseases of the Esophagus","topic":"Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Esophagectomy; Esophageal cancer; Anastomosis; Surgery; Retrospective cohort study; General surgery; Internal medicine; Cancer","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005994207,0.001458872,0.007540915,0.008898994,0.0006773634,0.002421787,0.0019211,0.002119842,0.00816963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02690405,0.0006799644,0.006643954,0.009422273,0.0007947308,0.002312843,0.00131475,0.0009330519,0.0004313313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002853588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01000227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006082542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01385402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943271,0.002158453,0.002165848,0.0003839807,0.0007825815,0.0001821001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838179,0.01021845,0.003825271,0.0002147577,0.00168032,0.0002432793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001755337,0.00001222404,0.000636475,0.9768535,0.007090485,0.00005507774,0.0001000671,0.00005018383,0.00008526135,0.00007264101,0.0008068923,0.01406161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006485768,0.0003028057,0.00471314,0.8805823,0.1023011,0.0003592787,0.0002848002,0.0001514625,0.0001635108,0.0002707796,0.01018583,0.00003636408],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002305315,0.9942284,0.0002583836,0.0004313051,0.0001774666,0.0009986946,0.001135251,0.00001907966,0.0004461472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03149472,0.9641859,0.001003417,0.0007734176,0.000185494,0.001420852,0.0006721973,0.00001111853,0.0002528366],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008898994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03170073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0263929454564147,"score_gpt":0.3771640832631729,"score_spread":0.3507711378067582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}