{"id":"W2891324321","doi":"10.1051/e3sconf/20184006005","title":"Flood hazard mapping techniques with LiDAR in the absence of river bathymetry data","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E3S Web of Conferences","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Bathymetry; Flood myth; Lidar; Elevation (ballistics); Channel (broadcasting); Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Calibration; Remote sensing; Geology; 100-year flood; Geography; Geotechnical engineering; Computer science; Statistics; Oceanography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005278827,0.0000940874,0.0001438086,0.00005664621,0.00004136225,0.00001967893,0.001010614,0.00002883897,0.0005613363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001575353,0.00005601168,0.00001499249,0.0002889186,0.0006752738,0.0002459731,0.0003828982,0.00007070399,0.00002005598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009145782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006258163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001059997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001880427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990079,0.00005463486,0.0001948433,0.0002293121,0.0003704166,0.0001428374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992732,0.00004920586,0.0001301314,0.0005163537,0.00001333784,0.00001773248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003268762,0.0002267346,0.9491795,0.00004247864,0.00004057769,0.000007024267,0.001786708,0.000006677924,0.00523065,0.005085709,0.003809037,0.03455227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004226207,0.0006573718,0.8937486,0.000231066,0.00003174219,0.000002267344,0.003853424,0.001604979,0.0190872,0.001532082,0.07854786,0.0002807504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.838488,0.00004614301,0.001638735,0.0003300904,0.00004400238,0.0002922008,0.00001149534,0.00002087748,0.1591284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902838,0.00008998332,0.009425906,0.00006269536,0.00002261516,0.000007937238,0.000005692577,0.000003446065,0.00009786248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1590306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6146238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02891326187227765,"score_gpt":0.2673764635922471,"score_spread":0.2384632017199695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}