{"id":"W2891358922","doi":"","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Open Access in Scopus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Subject (documents); Library science; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; English language; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01292704,0.0009135329,0.002538177,0.2923002,0.002284528,0.007032896,0.001265688,0.0006848465,0.005694481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0822929,0.0003665043,0.002356594,0.3369954,0.001248851,0.005687942,0.00339287,0.0005319012,0.001422319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00369935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006344237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007295519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006063456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9727563,0.003940998,0.004610767,0.001169695,0.01671048,0.0008116841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9148934,0.05011223,0.01482167,0.00222604,0.01656191,0.001384861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006140649,0.0005336162,0.3936002,0.01948022,0.002948715,0.001416767,0.0102211,0.004256896,0.003377132,0.01665058,0.02425759,0.5226431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001137729,0.0007494025,0.8764651,0.004098099,0.00209271,0.002408343,0.02319265,0.01202149,0.002850308,0.01012868,0.06561618,0.0002631815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.799123,0.03200737,0.0127403,0.002077478,0.0003768716,0.002096914,0.05862163,0.0008919014,0.09206458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295604,0.01814859,0.01801337,0.0001313029,0.0005544502,0.001673398,0.02754679,0.0001497158,0.004221945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06836551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8790385872218804,"score_gpt":0.7668242092888382,"score_spread":0.1122143779330422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}