{"id":"W2891358922","doi":"","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Open Access in Scopus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Subject (documents); Library science; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; English language; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06437872,0.0002222021,0.001045921,0.55816,0.0005048381,0.01656952,0.008974403,0.0001336319,0.000130797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.257585,0.0001223615,0.0002164648,0.834519,0.001430621,0.006781475,0.005385065,0.0004980281,0.000005538369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000414644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002169303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008034265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002613502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860889,0.008483156,0.001150467,0.0009280265,0.002912815,0.000436595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232477,0.07186452,0.001340398,0.001772143,0.00159806,0.0001771665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002660429,0.0002294376,0.5169576,0.00002534844,0.0001966335,0.000008607911,0.0333721,0.00005675768,0.0002577525,0.3647811,0.000514643,0.08333395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004292362,0.0001745336,0.765057,0.00009199074,0.00002001393,1.614246e-7,0.009150799,0.00118854,0.001430299,0.2219257,0.0003978134,0.0001338589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968034,0.004767084,0.009290705,0.002677395,0.0003507683,0.000642519,0.0002426237,0.0000050441,0.0139898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8838767,0.0005487505,0.1144013,0.0002245486,0.00001052958,0.00004569387,0.000004371992,0.0000115489,0.000876606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.276359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8790385872218804,"score_gpt":0.7668242092888382,"score_spread":0.1122143779330422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}