{"id":"W2891365785","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.085","title":"Analytical approach to win-win game analysis for Chinese and Japanese development assistance strategies in Africa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission; Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale; Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"China; Competition (biology); Win-win game; Destiny (ISS module); Game theory; Economics; International trade; Political science; Microeconomics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009934831,0.0001379874,0.000276519,0.0004678226,0.0002884428,0.0001322083,0.0002956852,0.0001443512,0.0002730616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004894896,0.0001042726,0.00006554341,0.001671415,0.0003444479,0.000142148,0.00007788831,0.0001002016,0.00003372083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001975015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002006558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003934338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001397165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984437,0.00009041508,0.0003068262,0.0003913877,0.0003414118,0.0004262145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993361,0.0002405589,0.000074753,0.00007647809,0.00007440473,0.0001976632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001170247,0.0006239726,0.8062533,0.00001299602,0.0003231812,0.000007262804,0.05329626,0.00005420522,0.00001299284,0.1372124,0.001123871,0.000962622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001814171,0.00005875698,0.9749575,0.000003763519,0.00002112173,1.467985e-7,0.003502861,0.0002662003,0.000006168496,0.002093344,0.01871992,0.0001888673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153993,0.00001415422,0.0007697482,0.000863141,0.00007798542,0.0003093084,0.00000400594,0.00003563302,0.08252677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927819,0.000003770712,0.005135322,0.0002045579,0.0001248882,0.0001197933,0.00001280543,0.000005033712,0.001611869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1687042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4252115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03487311654441679,"score_gpt":0.3236260457811339,"score_spread":0.2887529292367171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}