{"id":"W2891371182","doi":"10.1111/geoj.12261","title":"Deliberation for wildfire risk management: Addressing conflicting views in the Chiquitania, Bolivia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geographical Journal","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Underpinning; Amazon rainforest; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Risk governance; Corporate governance; Reflexivity; Risk management; Environmental planning; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Business; Ecology; Engineering; Computer science; Civil engineering; Social science; Environmental science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003141975,0.000134079,0.0001440757,0.00009759819,0.001089078,0.0002124694,0.0004291732,0.00005904167,0.0004575701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000821229,0.00009451829,0.0001262302,0.0004686763,0.0001520893,0.0002729939,0.0001024093,0.0004563839,0.00004782009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006783056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003658523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000140935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000475194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980611,0.0004498452,0.00038145,0.0002376012,0.0004586361,0.0004113257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992758,0.0001818855,0.0002433908,0.0002077758,0.000008070379,0.00008309176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001522295,0.0002735649,0.4217159,0.00003299435,0.0000799656,0.00005522543,0.003616009,0.0002313728,0.0006900899,0.0004628426,0.007962192,0.5647277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001750264,0.0006430244,0.7606299,0.000136255,0.00009365704,0.000440218,0.0007358749,0.02168517,0.00005094754,0.004466091,0.208961,0.0004076145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988592,0.0001806914,0.00379011,0.0005085967,0.0004284001,0.0006597324,0.000005130815,0.00002370655,0.005811641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965484,0.00008434153,0.002070196,0.0008141481,0.0003736822,0.00006497403,0.000002844391,0.0000159243,0.00002551808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.56432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8376418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0183947853912526,"score_gpt":0.2815030253870475,"score_spread":0.2631082399957949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}