{"id":"W2891402685","doi":"10.1007/s40152-018-0107-7","title":"Gender and marine protected areas: a case study of Danajon Bank, Philippines","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MAST. Maritime studies/Maritime studies","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Federation of University Women; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Marine protected area; Fishing; Marine conservation; Marine reserve; Intertidal zone; Fishery; Geography; Work (physics); Protected area; Socioeconomics; Fisheries management; Artisanal fishing; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Sociology; Engineering; Habitat; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008194371,0.0008883234,0.00168005,0.0002145633,0.001425602,0.00005401541,0.0003544617,0.0001191406,0.0007508476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007596113,0.000733705,0.0001616434,0.0009567442,0.001992567,0.000380358,0.00723949,0.0003333821,0.0001175044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002507268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006235352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0243716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953965,0.0003229993,0.001185964,0.001383102,0.0007390695,0.0009723759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977232,0.0004125001,0.0004003551,0.0007663401,0.0004992238,0.0001983757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008508401,0.003813293,0.7798821,0.002047587,0.01037531,0.004765469,0.05131956,0.00001283372,0.0005644617,0.0002222885,0.05216717,0.09397907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009745434,0.009177186,0.6605865,0.0005051049,0.002155427,0.004159662,0.2785823,0.0006240084,0.0002577672,0.005039419,0.02571378,0.003453386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739153,0.004930592,0.00001463943,0.0004273788,0.000577572,0.002680144,0.00005932239,0.0002677526,0.01712728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933374,0.00100785,0.0007316649,0.0001470803,0.0004270821,0.0007163714,0.00000876193,0.00007213013,0.003551653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2272628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04016616285574424,"score_gpt":0.2801469115444886,"score_spread":0.2399807486887444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}