{"id":"W2891421616","doi":"10.1051/matecconf/201819604089","title":"Use of Pairwise Comparison Method in Road-and-Bridge Tenders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MATEC Web of Conferences","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Call for bids; Pairwise comparison; Bridge (graph theory); Diversification (marketing strategy); Point (geometry); Computer science; Function (biology); Operations research; Presentation (obstetrics); Quality (philosophy); Procurement; Transport engineering; Business; Marketing; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001645092,0.000100956,0.0003673884,0.0005314117,0.00004267553,0.0001097216,0.0003435767,0.00004896711,0.0009668048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003661553,0.00007364259,0.00004387493,0.0006045613,0.0004231329,0.0003828254,0.0001365714,0.00006914583,0.00002519093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005144459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001617505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008670921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009656351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982195,0.0001646533,0.0007000514,0.0002502872,0.0005220393,0.0001434868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986579,0.0004049403,0.0003664973,0.0002736754,0.0002621442,0.00003484988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006088503,0.00002722615,0.6763781,0.00001678882,0.00001276891,3.793117e-7,0.0005813912,0.00001061165,0.0004007488,0.01064374,0.001587522,0.3102799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004677025,0.0002220479,0.8773105,0.00006828675,0.00001633576,0.000002528969,0.002238639,0.04754044,0.008080374,0.006725755,0.05714563,0.000181791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769121,0.0000445941,0.002347421,0.0003331896,0.0002505626,0.0001494281,0.000008559765,0.00001801702,0.01993616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963576,0.00004130643,0.003144271,0.00003388891,0.00001767649,0.00000396262,9.577833e-7,0.000002816541,0.0003975237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3100981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2893054254026324,"score_gpt":0.429376696257783,"score_spread":0.1400712708551506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}