{"id":"W2891481958","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2018.1483833","title":"African Green Revolution, food sovereignty and constrained livelihood choice in Mozambique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Livelihood; Green Revolution; Food security; Sovereignty; Agrarian society; Agroecology; Power (physics); Food systems; Political science; Political economy; Economy; Sociology; Development economics; Economic growth; Economics; Agriculture; Geography; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001103363,0.0007457802,0.001351266,0.0003659209,0.000904454,0.0001635507,0.0008131071,0.0003451721,0.0003190115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00195173,0.0004250014,0.0002650672,0.002302388,0.002714374,0.0005170339,0.0001582542,0.0006026253,0.00001205361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002292439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007587917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1084638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9604495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995297,0.0003779716,0.001412749,0.0007279976,0.0002406139,0.001943729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937578,0.000714078,0.0008665581,0.0001828935,0.002136579,0.002342101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004884974,0.0006281917,0.29263,0.001952373,0.005170863,0.004260853,0.2088638,0.0000879878,0.000611333,0.311822,0.02593657,0.1475476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001627588,0.006429855,0.5284631,0.003091615,0.0004846329,0.002485627,0.1426439,0.00005061018,0.00006075128,0.07647472,0.2361647,0.002022864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9372495,0.04281101,0.000003532538,0.01476785,0.001299868,0.0005152923,0.0004609219,0.00001987697,0.002872148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926408,0.001901065,0.0006810062,0.0004435405,0.002292772,0.00002478133,0.00001100432,0.00001571831,0.00198932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8519858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03204631751444562,"score_gpt":0.2177116596493283,"score_spread":0.1856653421348826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}