{"id":"W2891663734","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0246","title":"Additive biomass equations for slash pine trees: comparing three modeling approaches","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Oklahoma State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Mathematics; Slash (logging); Seemingly unrelated regressions; Tree (set theory); Component (thermodynamics); Statistics; Environmental science; Nonlinear regression; Regression analysis; Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Mathematical analysis; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001614159,0.00009098618,0.0001506437,0.0003489799,0.0006967933,0.00006801602,0.000498681,0.00006846357,0.0007332555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004465297,0.00008151281,0.00007305356,0.0003669092,0.0007260788,0.0002499638,0.00008085717,0.0002498057,0.0001723507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004745903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003019404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009536333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8391878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985606,0.00006442032,0.0002679127,0.0001773341,0.0002986178,0.0006310784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989699,0.0001679281,0.00007672262,0.0001789383,0.0001251764,0.000481398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002925548,0.0002152255,0.6022562,0.00006601471,0.0003539125,0.0001565244,0.00309399,0.105179,0.0001198608,0.1821209,0.08801487,0.01813097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001369604,0.00133713,0.2499214,0.0001020689,0.00004175859,0.00002984265,0.0009843966,0.5858593,0.0001361688,0.1380961,0.02182361,0.0002986466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7782255,0.00009615606,0.1952983,0.001854667,0.0003081395,0.0006166085,0.0000252969,0.000007458295,0.02356781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970693,0.000003321346,0.002193767,0.0000384796,0.00024061,0.00002997131,0.000008839594,0.00001320799,0.0004024859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8296515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1850007518832729,"score_gpt":0.3222178743485296,"score_spread":0.1372171224652567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}