{"id":"W2891950782","doi":"10.1177/0020702018795898","title":"China’s evolving motivations and goals in UN peacekeeping participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"African Union; United States Institute of Peace","keywords":"Peacekeeping; Beijing; China; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Diplomacy; Power (physics); Foreign policy; Great power; Development economics; Public administration; Economic growth; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Psychology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198371,0.0001186397,0.0002891867,0.0005095998,0.0003806821,0.0003149604,0.0005050944,0.00006955043,0.0001557675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002056935,0.0001171553,0.0001741543,0.00148528,0.000171126,0.0006612586,0.00005507986,0.0002713251,9.292467e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002336428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002116543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7523966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9611552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972597,0.0002870698,0.0007449272,0.0001200095,0.001247438,0.0003408534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974506,0.00006625258,0.0006909691,0.00007355402,0.001382637,0.0003359753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001760127,0.0002369243,0.9000248,0.000005556304,0.003971631,0.0005780702,0.008009286,0.008242068,0.00006266133,0.05337534,0.01039279,0.01492483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000536464,0.00005504907,0.9735029,0.00005146941,0.0003140722,0.0001501203,0.001820725,0.002923365,0.0000053389,0.0115086,0.008956793,0.0001751447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9319469,0.0004010795,0.00129834,0.06257524,0.0005248304,0.00003742824,0.00003197008,0.000004312133,0.003179864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967809,0.0003260215,0.0003344274,0.001144677,0.001372562,3.883146e-7,0.000002504736,0.000004142787,0.00003442913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2087586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6109678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00939678735769017,"score_gpt":0.3415747593309488,"score_spread":0.3321779719732587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}