{"id":"W2891978414","doi":"10.1080/00393630.2018.1471894","title":"The Cost-effectiveness of Preventive Conservation Actions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Conservation","topic":"Conservation Techniques and Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Valuation (finance); Cost effectiveness; Actuarial science; Cost–benefit analysis; Pareto principle; Maximization; Scale (ratio); Business; Institution; Operations management; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02365871,0.001718347,0.004098528,0.003352593,0.0004284712,0.002383182,0.001745152,0.001887276,0.004902781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05755266,0.0009392425,0.01337349,0.002550831,0.001024108,0.002151981,0.001239324,0.002588578,0.0001911227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003796912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002606439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004873396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005977896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9699739,0.02269761,0.002353702,0.001402342,0.003004406,0.0005680739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9276559,0.06461272,0.004219491,0.001577062,0.001322928,0.000611839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03551572,0.002431697,0.02630435,0.06297866,0.1523847,0.0003293342,0.0003469434,0.1216273,0.001306865,0.0136284,0.002790282,0.5803557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01729344,0.05214613,0.1210916,0.05114548,0.5736329,0.002940992,0.001431738,0.08115802,0.009199345,0.06069224,0.02870805,0.0005601859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3594435,0.568701,0.02999596,0.00621937,0.001674112,0.003456384,0.003346402,0.0002675182,0.02689585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408976,0.04381556,0.01220705,0.00062301,0.0002144824,0.0008201611,0.0005236436,0.00002586395,0.0008725791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02365871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1251207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2267136322837479,"score_gpt":0.3970106407536095,"score_spread":0.1702970084698616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}