{"id":"W2891979380","doi":"10.22323/2.17030208","title":"Digging deeper? Muddling through? How environmental activists make sense and use of science —an exploratory study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Citizen science; Science communication; Sociology; Public relations; Situational ethics; Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Science education; Social psychology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006630681,0.0004271307,0.0005828259,0.002272554,0.01176415,0.007929039,0.001486983,0.002370656,0.002322062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128742,0.000634108,0.0002966181,0.001548902,0.01260528,0.005063829,0.006064842,0.003053759,0.0003612457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002884752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003355562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02917953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05387721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927811,0.004551498,0.0001363688,0.0005453062,0.0006990144,0.001286791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989833,0.007854814,0.0008776817,0.0003136438,0.0004944223,0.000626412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001781687,0.00004566049,0.003122338,0.0000258606,0.000002925321,0.0001900214,0.9919862,0.00001169179,0.0006580278,0.001034806,0.0001671053,0.00273755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002982725,0.00002775915,0.002634785,0.0000382432,0.000003257934,0.00007683238,0.9897063,0.00005038214,0.0002074134,0.0003415101,0.00690259,0.000007956211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891146,0.0001564561,0.0006680589,0.0008875167,0.00001566568,0.00008415891,0.00002959981,0.000008942166,0.009034942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960749,0.0002471005,0.0006237067,0.0003364387,0.00001366154,0.00009514487,0.00002541862,0.00001574504,0.002567849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05801934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4454020205540797,"score_gpt":0.4531769124514657,"score_spread":0.00777489189738606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}