{"id":"W2892126241","doi":"10.1186/s13021-018-0100-x","title":"A systems approach to assess climate change mitigation options in landscapes of the United States forest sector","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carbon Balance and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; Comisión Nacional Forestal; Commission for Environmental Cooperation","keywords":"Environmental science; Greenhouse gas; Baseline (sea); Climate change; Climate change mitigation; Scenario analysis; Carbon sink; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Bioenergy; Carbon sequestration; Primary production; Land use; Ecosystem; Forest management; Ecosystem services; Agroforestry; Business; Biofuel; Ecology; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001628757,0.00007987323,0.000085355,0.00008282651,0.00004806196,0.00002565189,0.0001428656,0.00001934976,0.00001078711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002671451,0.00005860565,0.00001434656,0.000453767,0.00006451778,0.00006554544,0.0002329468,0.00002845615,0.00001571811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003468201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.815003e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001160557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004497726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993691,0.00003325424,0.0001205448,0.0001629896,0.0001330557,0.00018102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997219,0.000007219121,0.00005041705,0.0001830788,0.000005361391,0.00003196693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003006926,0.0001336259,0.9426812,0.0004438922,0.00003011273,0.000001864941,0.002456433,0.01004964,0.0001201105,0.03976966,0.003673327,0.0006100684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003620819,0.0000576178,0.8325897,0.0001130606,0.00002301881,5.037157e-7,0.0003538295,0.1461224,0.00001821575,0.0001447834,0.02007781,0.0001369791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9608783,0.0000237836,0.00003777248,0.0002108756,0.0001034704,0.0007015034,0.000006560086,0.00001553349,0.03802221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998707,0.000277524,0.0001183118,0.0002530897,0.00004934713,0.000178274,0.00001735231,0.000006465587,0.0003926111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1360727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2389869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02370296214704674,"score_gpt":0.2384451794564107,"score_spread":0.214742217309364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}