{"id":"W2892927166","doi":"10.1016/j.comgeo.2019.05.003","title":"Closest-pair queries in fat rectangles","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Geometry","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation of Korea","keywords":"Rectangle; Combinatorics; Set (abstract data type); Data structure; Range (aeronautics); Range query (database); Mathematics; Binary logarithm; Plane (geometry); Time complexity; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Sargable; Geometry; Search engine; Information retrieval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002821114,0.001041342,0.002783096,0.002212299,0.001742471,0.003680376,0.003044674,0.003091986,0.01238324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01803567,0.001042846,0.001608544,0.004858625,0.001400496,0.01035376,0.008157876,0.002142891,0.003049152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00127334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001101127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003016047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003069094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947544,0.001205601,0.0005643336,0.001067769,0.00177468,0.0006331131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924935,0.004283987,0.0003260766,0.002103664,0.0005074217,0.0002852824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003723184,0.0007167272,0.004845891,0.001451089,0.0003085347,0.001571357,0.001617004,0.2409891,0.01492868,0.2678145,0.07583465,0.3861993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003693847,0.0001874304,0.0005172558,0.0001158162,0.00007249167,0.0007284438,0.0008880035,0.653038,0.01113293,0.3126356,0.02026512,0.00004956474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.103999,0.002367014,0.8611094,0.002389714,0.000399284,0.0006113754,0.004938792,0.007491922,0.01669333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4647182,0.0008978911,0.5145494,0.0006266073,0.0001966149,0.000361591,0.009334218,0.00141565,0.007899818],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01238324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008811272025600598,"score_gpt":0.2329580050852848,"score_spread":0.2241467330596842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}