{"id":"W2893043367","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2017-0462","title":"A Monte Carlo appraisal of tree abundance and stand basal area estimation in forest inventories based on terrestrial laser scanning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Basal area; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Plot (graphics); Mathematics; Monte Carlo method; Distance sampling; Tree (set theory); Sampling design; Sampling bias; Abundance (ecology); Computer science; Forestry; Sample size determination; Ecology; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008506826,0.0004058613,0.0008604644,0.001295805,0.0004740181,0.0009351296,0.000925605,0.0009680032,0.00109374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02963476,0.0006276473,0.0006004891,0.001293908,0.00077082,0.001258704,0.0005779366,0.0004417475,0.0001533084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001230382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001312697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01329435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01157226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975389,0.001717118,0.00009373923,0.0001725619,0.0004084936,0.00006925423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624937,0.03443145,0.0008887177,0.000713339,0.001300057,0.0001727191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001644662,0.00005788578,0.01891907,0.0001671021,0.0001150352,0.0001689732,0.00009294308,0.9254235,0.0008049674,0.01740563,0.0003817381,0.03629867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006696509,0.00004001978,0.003130641,0.00001828001,0.00001640887,0.0000756562,0.00001877062,0.9928532,0.0003073031,0.003210201,0.0003110972,0.00001183514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2679411,0.003448136,0.7239408,0.0005337238,0.00005255907,0.0001610751,0.0001364501,0.0002451993,0.003540846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.847877,0.001350994,0.1491491,0.00006491753,0.00006901254,0.0001658587,0.0001931993,0.00006085521,0.00106899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01329435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04498887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.040325577949686,"score_gpt":0.3197088440403532,"score_spread":0.2793832660906672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}