{"id":"W2893226044","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.123","title":"VITAMIN K ANTAGONISTS AND CANCER RISK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Hazard ratio; Incidence (geometry); Cancer; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Cochrane Library; Oncology; Observational study; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic review; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006149103,0.002342652,0.01358288,0.004007181,0.0006191337,0.002664499,0.001790466,0.002485257,0.005549456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019409,0.001730271,0.0261394,0.005932101,0.000635296,0.00156957,0.001617909,0.001824973,0.0003992335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002172423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003538024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009736307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03554916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958218,0.001419272,0.001502518,0.0005359528,0.0004967251,0.0002237584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909735,0.005895359,0.002091415,0.000297843,0.0005945993,0.0001472393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001855713,0.0000427344,0.005069237,0.3934905,0.5833942,0.0001804082,0.0001098313,0.0003267505,0.000234456,0.0001253503,0.001071805,0.01409907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006325655,0.0001222102,0.003272793,0.01803771,0.9754808,0.0001195474,0.00005063092,0.00007738486,0.00005466161,0.0001227961,0.002003194,0.0000256448],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003438136,0.995347,0.0002567189,0.0001410732,0.0001035538,0.0001301704,0.0004006079,0.00001447966,0.000168346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1218048,0.8734819,0.001963776,0.001157341,0.0002314861,0.0004073241,0.0005127391,0.00002166535,0.0004188704],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01358288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03251994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1320481342868947,"score_gpt":0.3885868284098375,"score_spread":0.2565386941229427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}