{"id":"W2893247979","doi":"10.1080/17480930.2018.1516330","title":"Evaluating foliar nutrient concentration as an indicator of soil nutrients in reclaimed and natural forests in Alberta, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Natural Resources Limited","keywords":"Nutrient; Environmental science; Land reclamation; Peat; Agronomy; Phosphorus; Forest floor; Ecosystem; Soil water; Nutrient cycle; Revegetation; Ecology; Soil science; Biology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004728172,0.0003179392,0.0002718297,0.001276628,0.00150385,0.000706059,0.0008434883,0.0002205016,0.0004784418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005400924,0.0001909278,0.0001535965,0.001607554,0.0006120962,0.0001807883,0.0003241341,0.0002242696,0.0001063243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01494403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00937567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995984,0.00002301272,0.00001636318,0.00007289139,0.0001891986,0.0001001701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990994,0.00005701291,0.0001135195,0.00002112223,0.0005323508,0.0001766739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002859234,0.0001140611,0.9730912,0.00005195196,0.0000501138,0.0002718972,0.0009761596,0.0006273555,0.008536714,0.00009066107,0.0003783064,0.01552564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003208701,0.00002511332,0.9981408,0.000006402575,0.000009009776,0.00003480421,0.0005138059,0.0004072342,0.0004435112,0.00000979191,0.0004020455,0.000004281686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980223,0.0003000431,0.0001671943,0.00002365648,0.000002563982,0.00001992932,0.0005297221,0.00001232593,0.0009221551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967206,0.0002566444,0.0008894362,0.00003631334,0.000001511602,0.000010736,0.0008833456,0.000005056114,0.001196231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01494403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01051151492490847,"score_gpt":0.2681115809117626,"score_spread":0.2576000659868541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}