{"id":"W2893488420","doi":"10.1002/gch2.201800020","title":"Towards a Systematic Understanding of How to Institutionally Design Scientific Advisory Committees: A Conceptual Framework and Introduction to a Special Journal Issue","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Global Challenges","topic":"Delphi Technique in Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada; Centre for Global Health Research; York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Norges Forskningsråd; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Relevance (law); Legitimacy; Engineering ethics; Management science; Quality (philosophy); Conceptual framework; Political science; Order (exchange); Public relations; Sociology; Business; Politics; Engineering; Epistemology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007527753,0.0003583875,0.00145298,0.0005309896,0.0009359274,0.0006878189,0.00111818,0.0005416301,0.00008731321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006545634,0.0003126486,0.0002300059,0.00132263,0.001934024,0.0002582261,0.000349511,0.0005284301,0.00007594869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002386494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002407117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003122297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002642715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942782,0.001920167,0.0007035923,0.0006854685,0.001795559,0.0006170266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997376,0.0005399918,0.0004659231,0.0004605888,0.0006637315,0.0004937866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005890878,0.0001410961,5.800255e-7,0.05819659,0.0003724438,0.0000409809,0.0281199,0.000004267687,2.95125e-7,0.6101255,0.1371625,0.165777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006220768,0.0003057683,5.275041e-7,0.04567917,0.0001642082,0.00006291863,0.02896724,5.848455e-7,2.836007e-7,0.01443289,0.9100224,0.0003017994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003578549,0.9467996,0.03427174,0.009240713,0.002977445,0.003186196,0.00005978143,0.00007650327,0.003384455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000362233,0.9774051,0.01088447,0.00002778799,0.01091791,0.0001653257,0.000003250775,0.00002351912,0.000210399],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7728599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3972221084473531,"score_gpt":0.4665338941701704,"score_spread":0.06931178572281732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}