{"id":"W2893591975","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v11n5p263","title":"Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment of Historic Buildings in the State Park: A Case Study in Michigan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Michigan State University","keywords":"General partnership; Environmental quality; Work (physics); Environmental design; Plan (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Environmental planning; Architectural engineering; Environmental impact assessment; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Civil engineering; Business; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Political science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005800837,0.0001919264,0.000159194,0.0006526115,0.002260645,0.0008813358,0.0005332614,0.0005290784,0.001535056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009460678,0.000180538,0.000220708,0.001062985,0.0005585704,0.0004915347,0.0007092421,0.000382836,0.00008945172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002124057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007759195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05093365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2393823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995313,0.0002048565,0.00002085303,0.00005024156,0.0001213244,0.00007145275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995126,0.0001577153,0.00007970859,0.00002826577,0.0001281986,0.0000935041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002720395,0.002014028,0.7945485,0.000347465,0.0001055391,0.02659566,0.07360728,0.00526663,0.01420242,0.001995095,0.00263813,0.0784073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001649148,0.001075269,0.8022494,0.0001103862,0.00008412247,0.005192421,0.167346,0.006342484,0.005671121,0.000350252,0.01150225,0.00005988753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974884,0.00003520397,0.0002719814,0.00007725197,0.000001473429,0.00002596858,0.00003997671,0.000005364973,0.00205457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983418,0.00007673707,0.0007615403,0.00001922188,0.000002655917,0.00001354662,0.00003966405,0.000002296051,0.0007426849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05093365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1012744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07583891647120498,"score_gpt":0.2915742822249446,"score_spread":0.2157353657537396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}